Now there is a general list of leaders by points.
I suggest adding a points column to the SUBMITTERS and VERIFIERS table. So we can see the user’s contribution by his activity.
I think they are different points. Filling in information (SUBMITTERS) is more valuable because it takes a lot of time to find information and enter this information into the protocol.
I like your proposal on the adding points to both Submitters and Verifiers. It is indeed valuable information to understand one’s points portfolio.
However, I would not say that
Filling in information (SUBMITTERS) is more valuable. Imo, the ultimate aim of Golden is to provide users with accurate information. In this regard, verification is more valuable as it is the final stage of the process. Additionally, from my personal experience, submitting data is easier than verifying it (not all cases ofc, websites are quite easy to verify). Therefore, I would not make any distinction between various types of points sources.