There are many triples with incorrect links. For example whitepaper triple which links to the incorrect page of the official site of the project. So that is close to be accepted but it’s not. What do you think about adding the correction function?
Like when user rejects the triple he was asked if he could provide a correct link. And this could be a new triple to be accepted by the consensus. In case it was accepted, its “parent” triple which was incorrect, should be automatically rejected.
The user provided accepted correction gets extra points.
As for me, it seems to be nice for the database improvement. And it could also become a one more motivation for users to show more accuracy in triple validation.