Due to the large growth of registered fake accounts in order to get 500 starting points.
I propose to make a limit on the number of participants participating in the distribution of 1% airdrop.
Offer value:
1.Exclude fake accounts;
2.Increase the value of the project by adding triplets.
Distribute 1% of the airdrop among participants with more than 20,000 points. Thus, 500 points accrued upon registration will amount to 2.5% of the total number of points 20,000 points.
20,000 points consists of approximately 2,000 triplets at the rate of 1 triplet = 10 points.
I ask you to support this proposal by honestly working participants and who have spent a long time on the development of the Golden project.
I support this initiative, however, it is necessary to distinguish between fake accounts and accounts of ordinary users who did not want able to work out 2 thousand triples, it may make sense to divide the level of contribution into levels, limiting the upper and lower thresholds to a certain number of points and then dividing the total pool for testers in different proportions at different levels.
Adding points should be just through adding triplets. Or there will be a scoring of points during validation in a few hours, with a low level of accuracy.
Hey guys! I fully support your point that fake accounts should not receive any rewards. At the same time, I cannot support introducing a 20 000 points threshold or any other threshold in general. The reason behind it is that I strongly believe that all users acting in a good faith should receive their portion of rewards, no matter how big or small their contribution is. All time and efforts spent should be rewarded, otherwise it would be unfair.
In this regard I would opt for the suggestion of @bezya. Let’s just remove 500 sign-up points, thus making the fake accounts creation meaningless.
2000 triplets is 2 days of work. 20,000 triplets will show the participants serious intentions to continue working. Also, the participant will cherish the loss and will do the job honestly.
When it is very easy to create an account and the participant saves it and does not bring value to the project, then it is difficult. And the number of fake data will grow.
@jed Can this be up for a vote judging by the number of likes, views and approvals this has been on the Top Golden Protocol - Golden Community Golden Protocol for months now.
So the voting mechanism is only used for predicate proposals and similar data schema proposals right now.
I understand the frustration here and I think the best thing to make clear is that what everyone at Golden is working toward is developing the healthiest marketplace and ecosystem possible.
All the announcements around this can be found on Discord where the whole community can see them as they’re rolled out.